There are quite a few FTSE350 companies lining up to pay special dividends alongside their usual dividend payment over the next few weeks. Starting with ITV and Admiral who go ex-dividend tomorrow.
ITV - current price around 125p, 1.8p dividend, special dividend 4.0p - total 5.8p per share.
Admiral - current price around 1293p, dividend 21.4p, special dividend 24.1p - total 45.5p per share.
Fidessa - current price around 1793p, dividend 24.5p, special dividend 45.0p - total 69.5p per share.
Antofagasta - current price around 891p, dividend 8.4p, special dividend 52.0p - total 60.4 per share.
888 Holdings - current share price around 169.5p, dividend 3.02, special dividend 1.34p - total 4.36 per share.
You can work out the % yourself, but only 888 at around 2.5% are paying something close to the very low IR's currently available on savings with your local friendly bank.
Showing posts with label 888 Holdings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 888 Holdings. Show all posts
Tuesday, 30 April 2013
Friday, 19 April 2013
William Hill delivers the knockout punch?
There couldn't be a bigger contrast in market sentiment in action than comparing today's response to William Hill's results with Ladbrokes downbeat report delivered on Monday. As of writing the company is up around 5% on the back of its statement, so has William Hill delivered a knockout blow to its rival?
In fact, reports suggest that William Hill are seeing moderating growth, yet the market still seems to like what it sees. However, when it comes to presentation it would appear that William Hill knows better than Ladbrokes how to hide any bad news in its statement as can be seen by what it reported about its Cheltenham results.
Note how the bad Cheltenham results are glossed over by mentioning the Grand National success and the continued growth in digital players. Ladbrokes made no mention of any improvement in trading after Cheltenham, although surely they did well out of the National meeting as well? Ladbrokes statement left enough to doubt that going forward the company is still struggling, whereas William Hill are now seeing the benefits of its investment online, takeover of Sportingbet and relationship with Playtech. Judging by the two statements released this week, Ladbrokes could learn a lesson to be more upbeat about future prospects, unless of course it really is bad.
Going forward William Hill seems to be projected highly on growth company numbers compared to rival Ladbrokes, which increasingly looks like a value play. Of the two its the latter that has more potential upside, assuming of course that management has got it right on the recovery plan that they have.
Here's the numbers before today;
In fact, reports suggest that William Hill are seeing moderating growth, yet the market still seems to like what it sees. However, when it comes to presentation it would appear that William Hill knows better than Ladbrokes how to hide any bad news in its statement as can be seen by what it reported about its Cheltenham results.
Cheltenham results were not as good for us this year but just after the quarter end, Auroras Encore made the Grand National a major success for William Hill, even beating our record win achieved on the race in 2009 when Mon Mome romped home at 100-1. Both of these big meetings proved to be significant attractions for mobile bettors. Our app was downloaded 45,000 times on Grand National day and 51,000 times during the Cheltenham Festival, putting us at the top of the downloads league for both events.http://www.digitallook.com/news/rns/20838794-14283/WMH-Q1_Interim_Management_Statement_html?ac=,&username=,
Note how the bad Cheltenham results are glossed over by mentioning the Grand National success and the continued growth in digital players. Ladbrokes made no mention of any improvement in trading after Cheltenham, although surely they did well out of the National meeting as well? Ladbrokes statement left enough to doubt that going forward the company is still struggling, whereas William Hill are now seeing the benefits of its investment online, takeover of Sportingbet and relationship with Playtech. Judging by the two statements released this week, Ladbrokes could learn a lesson to be more upbeat about future prospects, unless of course it really is bad.
Going forward William Hill seems to be projected highly on growth company numbers compared to rival Ladbrokes, which increasingly looks like a value play. Of the two its the latter that has more potential upside, assuming of course that management has got it right on the recovery plan that they have.
Here's the numbers before today;
Friday, 8 February 2013
Online gambling one step closer in the USA
Some of the biggest movers in the UK markets this morning have been in the gaming sector on the back of a report from the US that legalized online gambling is one step closer.
This has had a dramatic effect on some of the UK online players this morning so far.
Bwin.Party up 20%
888 Holdings 17%
Betfair 4%
32Red 3.42%
Even behemoths William Hill and Ladbrokes are up slightly on the back of this news, the former has been positioning itself in the US over the last couple of years for the likelihood that sooner rather than later online gambling will be legalized.
While some investors will probably steer clear of these type of "sin" companies because of objections to gambling, for those that don't have a problem with the industry there is massive potential going forward, especially once countries like the US open their doors and legalize the industry. The sky is potentially the limit if the same were to happen in China, although no one should bet on that happening for some time.
Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ) conditionally vetoed the online gambling bill that would authorize Atlantic City casinos the ability to offer New Jersey residents the ability to play poker, roulette, baccarat, blackjack, craps, big six wheel, slot machines, mini baccarat, red dog, pai gow and sic bo online. Despite the conditional veto tag, proponents of the expansion of online gambling believe this is a big victory for the industry.
According to the New Jersey legislature glossary, a conditional veto is "a veto in which the Governor objects to parts of a bill and proposes amendments that would make it acceptable. If the Legislature re-enacts the bill with the recommended amendments, it is presented again to the Governor for signature."http://espn.go.com/poker/story/_/id/8925250/new-jersey-internet-gambling-bill-conditionally-vetoed-state-allow-online-gambling
This has had a dramatic effect on some of the UK online players this morning so far.
Bwin.Party up 20%
888 Holdings 17%
Betfair 4%
32Red 3.42%
Even behemoths William Hill and Ladbrokes are up slightly on the back of this news, the former has been positioning itself in the US over the last couple of years for the likelihood that sooner rather than later online gambling will be legalized.
While some investors will probably steer clear of these type of "sin" companies because of objections to gambling, for those that don't have a problem with the industry there is massive potential going forward, especially once countries like the US open their doors and legalize the industry. The sky is potentially the limit if the same were to happen in China, although no one should bet on that happening for some time.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)